
| News | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Missouri Attorney General's Office confirmed an investigation into Matt Miller following allegations tied to his charity fantasy leagues. | |
Submitted at Today, 01:33 AM by sleeppoor | |
0 Comments | |
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis fired two members of his clemency advisory board Wednesday for publicly speaking against his decision to free Tina Peters after she was convicted of election-related crimes. | |
Submitted at Today, 01:33 AM by sleeppoor | |
Submitted at Today, 03:08 AM by sleeppoor | |
The ruling is about whether trans people have the same rights as everybody else—and the court said they don’t. | |
Submitted at Yesterday, 07:09 PM by sleeppoor | |
Fans of fraternal Scottish music duo Boards of Canada could be forgiven for being a little overexcited when news of the feverishly anticipated fifth LP, Inferno, the group’s first new music in 13 years, arrived through a series of postal packages stuffed with VHS tapes in spring of 2026. | |
Submitted at Yesterday, 02:29 AM by sleeppoor | |
The Longleaf Trace removed all water fountains in June over homelessness concerns, alarming trail users and health experts. | |
Submitted at Yesterday, 03:23 AM by sleeppoor | |
Submitted at 06-30-2026, 09:15 PM by B. Weed | |
Submitted at 06-30-2026, 03:44 PM by sleeppoor | |
The Supreme Court yet again loosened campaign finance restrictions on Tuesday by striking down limits on how much political parties may raise and spend on candidates.
By a 6-to-3 vote along ideological lines, the court ruled the law, which had been enacted in 1974, violates political parties' First Amendment rights. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion.
At issue in the case was a post-Watergate law that Congress passed to limit the amount of money individuals can give to political parties. The law, the Federal Election Campaign Act, also limited how much money political parties can spend on their candidates. Other types of organizations, like political action committees and Super PACs, have no limits on the amount of money they can raise and spend on elections. But unlike parties, they cannot coordinate with candidates.
Tuesday's decision means that parties get the best of both worlds. They can both coordinate with candidates and raise unlimited funds. | |
Submitted at 06-30-2026, 03:46 PM by sleeppoor | |
Submitted at 06-30-2026, 03:43 PM by sleeppoor | |
Submitted at 06-30-2026, 02:57 AM by sleeppoor | |
Hundreds of contractors working on a project for Meta pretended to be kids in order to see how other chatbots like Gemini and ChatGPT would respond to high-risk subjects, WIRED found. | |
Submitted at 06-30-2026, 02:30 AM by sleeppoor | |
"... the tech industry has completely run out of ideas, and all that’s left is a cargo cult that hasn’t had a human experience since 2015." | |
Submitted at 06-29-2026, 09:05 PM by B. Weed | |
Six people were killed in a shooting at a shelter for mothers and children in northern Germany. | |
Submitted at 06-29-2026, 04:49 PM by sleeppoor | |
AI-obsessed executives and managers are creating a distinct new type of toxic work environment for the slop era, workers told us. | |
Submitted at 06-29-2026, 06:36 PM by thirteen3seven | |
The Supreme Court on Monday gave President Donald Trump sweeping new authority over approximately two dozen multi-member agencies that Congress intended to be independent. By a vote of 6-3, the justices struck down a federal law that bars the president from firing members of the Federal Trade Commission except in cases of “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” That law, a majority of the justices ruled, violates the constitutional separation of powers between the three branches of government. And in reaching that decision, the court overruled its 91-year-old decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which had upheld the law at the center of the dispute. | |
Submitted at 06-29-2026, 03:31 PM by sleeppoor | |
WAS IT WORTH IT? Zayd Ayers Dohrn spends his new book, Dangerous, Dirty, Violent, and Young: A Fugitive Family in the Revolutionary Underground, asking the question in two distinct senses he keeps mistaking for one. Was it worth it for his parents, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, along with many of their friends, to march out of the 1969 convention of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), form the Weathermen and then the Weather Underground to engage in a decade of jailbreaks and bombing campaigns in the name of total war against the government of the United States, go on the run, and live as fugitives until they ultimately surrendered to the FBI in 1980? Was it worth it as in, did any of this in any way advance the causes the Weathermen were fighting for?
And was it worth it for them to do all those things, even if it meant that Zayd Ayers Dohrn and his brother Malik and their adopted brother Chesa—the son of fellow Weathermen David Gilbert and Kathy Boudin, who spent Chesa’s childhood in prison—were born de facto fugitives from federal law enforcement? As in, awoken in the middle of the night to flee from safe houses across the United States, taught to throw tails before they had birth certificates, subject to the kind of psychological damage that left Ayers Dohrn “traumatized,” beset not only by “nightmares but fits of malaise” as well, drinking from a milk bottle until he was 10 years old. Was it worth it?
Ayers Dohrn, now a middle-aged playwright and podcaster who is “embarrassed” whenever he finds himself in a chanting protest march, cannot quite say. He’s a good liberal. He knows that the War in Vietnam was wrong and that COINTELPRO broke the law. He doesn’t appreciate, for example, that they illegally bugged his aunt Jennifer’s apartment for years and stole a pair of her underwear to keep as a souvenir. But he reserves words like “moral catastrophe” for his parents and their friends. He’s “uncomfortable” with “insurrection”—he confronts his father with footage of the January 6 Capitol riot as if this will prove some kind of point—and believes in the “painstaking work of the legal system and the long arc of history bending slowly, but inevitably, toward justice.” Sure, “militant or even violent resistance” might be justified in the face of something unambiguously bad—“to fight against slavery, for example. Or fascism. Or genocide”—but, he asks, “were the conflicts of the 1960s—the Vietnam War and the assault on the civil rights movement—such a time?” | |
Submitted at 06-29-2026, 06:59 AM by sleeppoor | |
Inmates have seized control of parts of a regional jail in North Carolina after overpowering correctional staff. | |
Submitted at 06-29-2026, 05:56 PM by guest | |
The main pillars of the founding narrative have fallen on hard times. Today, its meaning is up for grabs | |
Submitted at 06-28-2026, 06:04 PM by B. Weed | |
Peter Diamandis is the latest tech executive to argue that global surveillance will make the world a better place, following Larry Ellison's comments in 2024. | |
Submitted at 06-27-2026, 08:42 PM by sleeppoor | |

The Missouri Attorney General's Office confirmed an investigation into Matt Miller following allegations tied to his charity fantasy leagues.
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis fired two members of his clemency advisory board Wednesday for publicly speaking against his decision to free Tina Peters after she was convicted of election-related crimes.
The ruling is about whether trans people have the same rights as everybody else—and the court said they don’t.
Fans of fraternal Scottish music duo Boards of Canada could be forgiven for being a little overexcited when news of the feverishly anticipated fifth LP, Inferno, the group’s first new music in 13 years, arrived through a series of postal packages stuffed with VHS tapes in spring of 2026.
The Longleaf Trace removed all water fountains in June over homelessness concerns, alarming trail users and health experts.
The Supreme Court yet again loosened campaign finance restrictions on Tuesday by striking down limits on how much political parties may raise and spend on candidates.
By a 6-to-3 vote along ideological lines, the court ruled the law, which had been enacted in 1974, violates political parties' First Amendment rights. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion.
At issue in the case was a post-Watergate law that Congress passed to limit the amount of money individuals can give to political parties. The law, the Federal Election Campaign Act, also limited how much money political parties can spend on their candidates. Other types of organizations, like political action committees and Super PACs, have no limits on the amount of money they can raise and spend on elections. But unlike parties, they cannot coordinate with candidates.
Tuesday's decision means that parties get the best of both worlds. They can both coordinate with candidates and raise unlimited funds.
Hundreds of contractors working on a project for Meta pretended to be kids in order to see how other chatbots like Gemini and ChatGPT would respond to high-risk subjects, WIRED found.
"... the tech industry has completely run out of ideas, and all that’s left is a cargo cult that hasn’t had a human experience since 2015."
Six people were killed in a shooting at a shelter for mothers and children in northern Germany.
AI-obsessed executives and managers are creating a distinct new type of toxic work environment for the slop era, workers told us.
The Supreme Court on Monday gave President Donald Trump sweeping new authority over approximately two dozen multi-member agencies that Congress intended to be independent. By a vote of 6-3, the justices struck down a federal law that bars the president from firing members of the Federal Trade Commission except in cases of “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” That law, a majority of the justices ruled, violates the constitutional separation of powers between the three branches of government. And in reaching that decision, the court overruled its 91-year-old decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which had upheld the law at the center of the dispute.
WAS IT WORTH IT? Zayd Ayers Dohrn spends his new book, Dangerous, Dirty, Violent, and Young: A Fugitive Family in the Revolutionary Underground, asking the question in two distinct senses he keeps mistaking for one. Was it worth it for his parents, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, along with many of their friends, to march out of the 1969 convention of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), form the Weathermen and then the Weather Underground to engage in a decade of jailbreaks and bombing campaigns in the name of total war against the government of the United States, go on the run, and live as fugitives until they ultimately surrendered to the FBI in 1980? Was it worth it as in, did any of this in any way advance the causes the Weathermen were fighting for?
And was it worth it for them to do all those things, even if it meant that Zayd Ayers Dohrn and his brother Malik and their adopted brother Chesa—the son of fellow Weathermen David Gilbert and Kathy Boudin, who spent Chesa’s childhood in prison—were born de facto fugitives from federal law enforcement? As in, awoken in the middle of the night to flee from safe houses across the United States, taught to throw tails before they had birth certificates, subject to the kind of psychological damage that left Ayers Dohrn “traumatized,” beset not only by “nightmares but fits of malaise” as well, drinking from a milk bottle until he was 10 years old. Was it worth it?
Ayers Dohrn, now a middle-aged playwright and podcaster who is “embarrassed” whenever he finds himself in a chanting protest march, cannot quite say. He’s a good liberal. He knows that the War in Vietnam was wrong and that COINTELPRO broke the law. He doesn’t appreciate, for example, that they illegally bugged his aunt Jennifer’s apartment for years and stole a pair of her underwear to keep as a souvenir. But he reserves words like “moral catastrophe” for his parents and their friends. He’s “uncomfortable” with “insurrection”—he confronts his father with footage of the January 6 Capitol riot as if this will prove some kind of point—and believes in the “painstaking work of the legal system and the long arc of history bending slowly, but inevitably, toward justice.” Sure, “militant or even violent resistance” might be justified in the face of something unambiguously bad—“to fight against slavery, for example. Or fascism. Or genocide”—but, he asks, “were the conflicts of the 1960s—the Vietnam War and the assault on the civil rights movement—such a time?”
Inmates have seized control of parts of a regional jail in North Carolina after overpowering correctional staff.
The main pillars of the founding narrative have fallen on hard times. Today, its meaning is up for grabs
Peter Diamandis is the latest tech executive to argue that global surveillance will make the world a better place, following Larry Ellison's comments in 2024.